CRITIQUE OF PURE FREE ENERGY PRINCIPLE

 
 
 
 

The paper by Ramstead et al. reminds us the efforts of eminent scientists such as Whitehead and Godel. After having produced influential manuscripts, they turned to more philosophical issues, understanding the need for a larger formalization of their bounteous scientific results. In a similar way, the successful free-energy principle has been generalized, in order to encompass not only the brain activity of the original formulation, but also the whole spectrum of life. Here we go through philosophical (the principle of identity) and physical (temperature, Pandemonium architecture, time reversal entropy) issues that might be correlated with the free energy principle.

 
 

DOWNLOAD HERE THE PDF

james.peters3@umanitoba.caArturo Tozzi (Corresponding Author)
Center for Nonlinear Science, University of North Texas
1155 Union Circle, #311427
Denton, TX 76203-5017, USA, and
Computational Intelligence Laboratory, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
Winnipeg R3T 5V6 Manitoba
tozziarturo@libero.it
James F. Peters
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Manitoba
75A Chancellor’s Circle, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada and
Department of Mathematics, Adıyaman University, 02040 Adıyaman, Turkey,
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Adıyaman University
02040 Adıyaman, Turkey and Computational Intelligence Laboratory, University of
Manitoba, WPG, MB, R3T 5V6, Canada
james.peters3@umanitoba.ca